Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Κανονισμός Λειτουργίας
Σωματείο AVClub
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Μουσική - Κινηματογράφος - Τηλεόραση - Πολιτισμός
Μουσική
Παρουσιάσεις δίσκων - Aφιερώματα
Resurrection-Mahler Symphony No 2
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Δημήτρης Ν." data-source="post: 380890" data-attributes="member: 79"><p><strong>Απάντηση: Re: Resurrection-Mahler Symphony No 2</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Εννοείς πανθομολογουμένως όπως εδώ;:flipout: : </p><p></p><p>An internetforum for classical music afficionados that I visit at times, has a recurring topic called "name the greatest recording of (a particular work)". Over time, I started noticing that no matter what the work was, the vast majority of recordings nominated would stem from the early sixties, the fifties, and not rarely even earlier. I tend to regard this as a peculiar brand of musical snobbism, but try to keep an open mind. So when this Klemperer disc from 1962 was voted, with overwhelming majority, to be the greatest recording ever of Mahler 2, I went ahead and got myself a copy. I generally tend to avoid such old recordings because in my experience, their sonics are simply not up to the task set by a symphony of this size and complexity. Surprisingly, however, the sound may well be the best feature of this recording. No doubt some clever fiddling with the "Prism SNS system" (see the back cover) squeezed every last drop of sound out of the original tape. The bass is impressively rich, even too rich at times, and the antiphonal first and second violins are clearly detailed throughout. Yet the dynamic range is truncated at both ends, and, as usual in recordings this old, big, intricate climaxes are not handled at all well. Which unfortunately means that the thrilling, goosebump provoking culmination points that Mahler works so hard to achieve in this symphony, end up as featureless, opaque blurs. The famous percussion crescendos in the finale are total non-events, and the final climax does not blaze. It's like watching a complicated thriller and then being ushered out of the cinema just before the dénouement. </p><p></p><p>But if only that were all. However, sonics aside, I must admit that after listening to this disc I was left completely puzzled as to why this would qualify as a "great recording of the century". Simply because Klemperer is conducting and we are allowed to hear Schwarzkopf's disappointingly wobbly soprano? Klemperer met Mahler, so his Mahler must be good? Has the mythology around these names evolved sufficiently to convince us that sloppy ensemble, out of tune instruments, ignoration of the composer's instructions, and general lack of inspiration amount to great music making? Well, not for me; even in the brief fragment of the first track that you can listen to here on Amazon, you'll hear a bassoon defiantly coming in a full beat too early. And it goes on like that, and on and on. The violins are out of sync on many occasions. Instrumental entrances are incomprehensibly approximate, time and again. The Scherzo is plodding and humourless, and features horribly out of tune flutes somewhere near the beginning. The first few bars of Urlicht struck me as refreshingly unfussy, but lead into an ungainly, foursquare reading that lacks any poetry whatsoever, and has an ugly crescendo on "leuchten", where Mahler writes pp. Then again, Klemperer does not care much about Mahler's many markings anyway. Rather than giving us an "ernst" and "feierlich" first movement, Klemperer hurries through as if he has a train to catch. Phrases are hardly allowed to breathe. At the end, where Mahler wants Tempo I for the downward runs of triplets, Klemperer makes a mad dash for it. Another characteristic instance occurs just before nr. 46 in the finale: Mahler writes "nicht schleppen" and K. slows down; then, at 46, Mahler writes "Langsam" and K. switches to a faster tempo. If that is greatness, I can do without it. I'm a long-time fan of Kaplan's first recording of this work, which is dedicated, precise, exciting and moving all at the same time. But Haitink, Bernstein (DG), Mehta (Decca) and many others too offer alternatives that are far more impressive than this unbelievably overrated disc.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Δημήτρης Ν., post: 380890, member: 79"] [b]Απάντηση: Re: Resurrection-Mahler Symphony No 2[/b] Εννοείς πανθομολογουμένως όπως εδώ;:flipout: : An internetforum for classical music afficionados that I visit at times, has a recurring topic called "name the greatest recording of (a particular work)". Over time, I started noticing that no matter what the work was, the vast majority of recordings nominated would stem from the early sixties, the fifties, and not rarely even earlier. I tend to regard this as a peculiar brand of musical snobbism, but try to keep an open mind. So when this Klemperer disc from 1962 was voted, with overwhelming majority, to be the greatest recording ever of Mahler 2, I went ahead and got myself a copy. I generally tend to avoid such old recordings because in my experience, their sonics are simply not up to the task set by a symphony of this size and complexity. Surprisingly, however, the sound may well be the best feature of this recording. No doubt some clever fiddling with the "Prism SNS system" (see the back cover) squeezed every last drop of sound out of the original tape. The bass is impressively rich, even too rich at times, and the antiphonal first and second violins are clearly detailed throughout. Yet the dynamic range is truncated at both ends, and, as usual in recordings this old, big, intricate climaxes are not handled at all well. Which unfortunately means that the thrilling, goosebump provoking culmination points that Mahler works so hard to achieve in this symphony, end up as featureless, opaque blurs. The famous percussion crescendos in the finale are total non-events, and the final climax does not blaze. It's like watching a complicated thriller and then being ushered out of the cinema just before the dénouement. But if only that were all. However, sonics aside, I must admit that after listening to this disc I was left completely puzzled as to why this would qualify as a "great recording of the century". Simply because Klemperer is conducting and we are allowed to hear Schwarzkopf's disappointingly wobbly soprano? Klemperer met Mahler, so his Mahler must be good? Has the mythology around these names evolved sufficiently to convince us that sloppy ensemble, out of tune instruments, ignoration of the composer's instructions, and general lack of inspiration amount to great music making? Well, not for me; even in the brief fragment of the first track that you can listen to here on Amazon, you'll hear a bassoon defiantly coming in a full beat too early. And it goes on like that, and on and on. The violins are out of sync on many occasions. Instrumental entrances are incomprehensibly approximate, time and again. The Scherzo is plodding and humourless, and features horribly out of tune flutes somewhere near the beginning. The first few bars of Urlicht struck me as refreshingly unfussy, but lead into an ungainly, foursquare reading that lacks any poetry whatsoever, and has an ugly crescendo on "leuchten", where Mahler writes pp. Then again, Klemperer does not care much about Mahler's many markings anyway. Rather than giving us an "ernst" and "feierlich" first movement, Klemperer hurries through as if he has a train to catch. Phrases are hardly allowed to breathe. At the end, where Mahler wants Tempo I for the downward runs of triplets, Klemperer makes a mad dash for it. Another characteristic instance occurs just before nr. 46 in the finale: Mahler writes "nicht schleppen" and K. slows down; then, at 46, Mahler writes "Langsam" and K. switches to a faster tempo. If that is greatness, I can do without it. I'm a long-time fan of Kaplan's first recording of this work, which is dedicated, precise, exciting and moving all at the same time. But Haitink, Bernstein (DG), Mehta (Decca) and many others too offer alternatives that are far more impressive than this unbelievably overrated disc. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Μουσική - Κινηματογράφος - Τηλεόραση - Πολιτισμός
Μουσική
Παρουσιάσεις δίσκων - Aφιερώματα
Resurrection-Mahler Symphony No 2
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…